Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ronald's avatar

No:

The Triad of Scientific Certainty: These principles are non-negotiable:

- Isolation = Prove existence.

- Independent Variable = Prove cause.

- True Controls = Validate conclusions.

Therefore, in virology, we must:

- Isolate the virus (prove it exists).

- Test the virus alone (prove it acts).

- Compare to a true negative (prove nothing else acts).

* Violate one, violate all.

This is the challenge that faces virology...

Virology uses the term isolation as a misnomer;

- doesn't match the strict scientific definitions of this term.

- suggests a complete separation that isn't actually achieved.

- implies a purity that does not exist in the samples.

Virology claims to isolate viruses when in fact it cannot.

This is not a matter of debate or interpretation:

- No virus has ever been physically isolated.

- No virus has ever been separated from host tissue.

- No virus has ever been purified from other cellular material.

- It is technically impossible with current methods.

- Virology acknowledges this while continuing to claim isolation

* This fundamental contradiction cannot be overstated:

* Virology has built an entire field on something it cannot demonstrate exists.

This is not a minor technical issue - it is a fatal flaw that undermines the entire field.

An isolated virus as defined within virology is always in the presence of;

- Cellular debris.

- Various proteins.

- Other biological materials.

- Genetic material from multiple sources.

* Cannot fulfill the requirements to be an Independent Variable.

With each virus we study:

- We never have a pure sample.

- We're always working with complex mixtures.

- We can't definitively separate viral components from other materials.

- We can't fulfil the strict definition of isolation or purification.

The Core Issue:

If we cannot truly isolate a virus, then we cannot establish with certainty:

- What genetic material belongs to it.

- What proteins are uniquely its own.

- What effects it specifically causes.

*Virology as a valid science begins and ends here. R.I.P.

There you go, the science.

Expand full comment
dawnfrench's avatar

I have not dug into the specifics of FMD, but I have started investigating for myself another alleged cattle disease, trichomoniasis. In Texas, there is a requirement to test for this disease before selling breeding bulls.

I have a very small herd of Dexters (small Irish breed) and occasionally buy and sell breeding stock.

Here, the Texas Animal Health Commission is the regulating entity. Interestingly, the commission is made up of 13 political appointees. You are not invited unless you’re a big player who knows the governor.

https://www.tahc.texas.gov/

https://www.tahc.texas.gov/animal_health/cattle/

It appears that the “scientific” information on this disease comes from Texas A&M:

https://www.tahc.texas.gov/news/brochures/TAHCBrochure_TrichFemaleCattle.pdf

You can see the AgriLife logo at the top of that fact sheet. And at the bottom is a list of references, about half of them can be found online for free, and the other half are either behind a paywall or can’t be found.

But please notice that the very first statement of “fact” has NO reference:

“Cattle Trichomoniasis or “trich” is a sexually transmitted disease of cattle caused by the organism Tritrichomonas foetus.”

The references I can find online also make that causality statement, as if it were proven, but provide no reference.

So, I FOIA’d TAMU.

Interestingly, they do not have any studies, reports, papers, ANYTHING (!), showing HOW they PROVED CAUSATION, and nothing showing how all other causes, environmental or otherwise, had been ruled out.

What they provided was a paper by one of their “experts” describing using the PCR method to detect the presence of the T. foetus organism in a sample collected from cattle and does not claim to provide proof that T. foetus is the cause of any disease and does not claim to be an investigation ruling out all other possible causes, environmental or otherwise.

And they provided a copy of the patent on the PCR process, also by the same “expert.” And it seems the PCR process, being one step removed from the culture process, can be “gamed” to provide whatever results needed.

Both documents make that same causality claim and fail to reference it.

I also FOIA’d the TAHC and the USDA, who has funded grants for some of the papers that failed to specify the source for the causality statement. I have received nothing from these agencies.

I discovered from reading the available papers that there are healthy animals that co-exist with this organism, and unhealthy/deceased animals (spontaneously aborted, infertile) who do not. So they cannot even show good correlation between the presence of the organism and the observed “disease.”

And because we are assured correlation does not equal causation, and extraordinary claims (of causation) require extraordinary evidence, then the lack of references for the causality statements is highly suspect.

What I also discovered in the papers I read, was that to diagnose an “infection,” and label the animal “diseased,” the ONLY requirement is that the T. foetus organism be found in a sample of bull smegma collected by a vet (likely trained at TAMU) and cultured in a lab (likely the one at TAMU).

And my perfectly healthy bull, merely on the basis of the presence of a particular organism, can be labeled “infected” and “diseased,” but “asymptomatic.”

And the TAHC, comprised of BIG AG political appointees, can then FORCE me to MURDER (“cull”) my perfectly healthy bull.

All based on that CAUSALITY statement that they have no proof for.

So, you can see, this is a means for the big players here to profit ($$ for the vet, $$ for the lab, $$ for the patent-holders, $$ for the university, etc.) AND a means to commit state-sponsored tyranny against small farmers (who ultimately pay all the $$) and restrict the competition from the small farmers, who cannot remove themselves from the BIG AG food system if they are forced to cull perfectly healthy breeding stock.

So, no, I refuse to participate in this genocide against an organism that should be innocent until PROVEN guilty (the relationship could be neutral or beneficial, but without a thorough investigation no one can say otherwise).

SHOW ME YOUR PROOF OF CAUSATION USING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, DEFINITIVELY RULING OUT ALL OTHER POSSIBLE CAUSES.

Otherwise you can fuck right the hell off.

Expand full comment
192 more comments...

No posts