Pierre Kory: The War on Ivermectin – and “no-virus” implications

By Mees Baaijen, March 24, 2025, 1100 words, 4 minutes

In his impressive 2023 book, Kory briefly describes his early years, followed by his pre-Covid experiences with the medical establishment. In his opinion, 90 % of the doctors do not think critically, and prefer to follow protocols (Mees B.: that’s part of the century-old “dumbing down” project in the West, and the on-ramp to robotization of the health services). Life saving innovations, such as Vitamine C applied intraveneously for ICU sepsis patients developed by top doctor Paul Marik, were met with great resistance by the colleagues, although the reduction in mortality was large and obvious. Kory pushed for other innovations too, while still believing that the doctors were the problem, but the system was OK. After 2020, he had to think that over, many, many times.

When the Covid surge came in many but not all hospitals, and patients all over the world were put on supportive measures only, and not treated, Kory realized that something was very wrong. He found out that the patients needing oxygen or ventilation often had “happy hypoxia”, which means low oxygen levels yet often without extreme breathlessness or discomfort. This was rarely seen before Covid. In older or frail patients with the flu, the secondary pneumonia (by bacteria) is normally “wet”, with fluid accumulation in the lung tissue and also in the airways. The “happy hypoxia patients” had a dry “organized” pneumonia (with an interstitial inflamation of the lung tissue, but open airways). Kory and his collaborators then started to apply corticosteroids, with great success.

In April 2020, Kory and his colleagues established Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and started promoting alternative treatment options. By October 2020, ivermectin was included in the recommendations, and from then on all hell broke loose. The pharmaceutical industry, which Kory nicknamed Big Harma (I use Pharmafia to indicate its criminal character), understood very well that their expensive, dangerous and inefficient anti-virals would be pushed quickly out of the market if the cheap, save and highly effective ivermectin would be allowed as treatment for Covid patients.

Not only that, ivermectin had also shown to be a highly efficient preventive drug, and was successfully used in many countries by frontline health workers and people at risk. Soon, large scale campaigns based on ivermectin in Peru and elsewhere started to show that a whole Covid epidemic would collapse in weeks.

And worse, for Big Harma, with a broad application of ivermectin there would be no justification for the sale and application of experimental mRNA vaccines! In the following years – in which Kory would loose three jobs - Pharmafia would play every card of its criminal arsenal to prevent this, which Kory describes in frightening detail. It came with the cost of many human lives. Even today, Kory’s and FLCCC’s Wikipedia pages are filled to the brim with false accusations and lies.

One of Pharmafia‘s biggest tricks for acceptation of a new medicine is to require evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT). This is in line with the evidence based medicine movement, which is also supported by Pharmafia. These trials are expensive and complicated, and take more time. They can also be easily falsified, and that was done on a large scale with Big Pharma’s ivermectin trials: give it too late, in too high or too low doses, and its effects will be minimal – while many people will die, but that’s never a problem for Pharmafia.

And if a medicine has already been proved on the battlefield, where ivermectin had dramatically positive results, then such RCT trials are also unethical, because many people in the placebo group will unnecessarily die.

Implications for “no-virus”

In his book, clinician Kory does not discuss any virological aspects. He and his colleagues simply noticed that there was a new type of flu and pneumonia, which had to be treated differently, and over the course of the Covid period they developed many treatment protocols, which are now followed by thousands of doctors all over the world, and have saved the lives of millions. Time has proven them right, because there are now over a thousand RCT studies with over 150.000 patients proving that ivermectin miraculously cures Covid.

That ivermectin, with its anti-viral qualities, cured so many people – and often very quickly - is because they suffered from a viral infection (parasites and bacteria causing a respiratory syndrome can easily be ruled out). From the clinical differences, that virus was not the good old influenza (which by the way can also make hospitals overflow). The new virus had spikes which blocked ACE2 receptors in the patient’s bodies, which was the main mechanism underlying the inflammatory syndrome in these patients.

To state that ivermectin did not influence the viral infection, but impacted on “terrain” factors like stress, toxins, nutritional problems, or radiation is pure undocumented nonsense. As is the statement that ivermectin did not cure these Covid patients: it just depressed their symptoms, for which no evidence has ever been published. The Covid virus hypothesis is simply the only valid one. Moreover, it has been confirmed in many labs (see Hammond’s papers).

In my previous “and last” piece on “no-virus” I explained how the no-virus leaders shrewdly circumvented these hard facts – ivermectin killing a virus in large numbers of patients - by focusing on and criticizing an in vitro study from 2020. And I began to see that they use a similar trick as the Pharmafia does when it declares RCT to be the ONLY scientific gold standard under ALL conditions: Cowan et al declare that a virus can only be detected in a lab after it has been 100.00% purified (part of their “scientific” gold standard), which is impossible (99% will not do): so viruses don’t exist! No more discussion, we just proved that 100% of the worldwide achievements in virology during the last 130 years can be thrown out of the window!

With this trick they declare all field observations of obvious contagion events by doctors, veterinarians and laymen null and void. As said, that includes the impressive evidence that the lives of millions of people with Covid symptoms were saved by treating them with anti-virals.

So please, trust the good, independent and critically thinking doctors like Kory and fortunately many others, who still trust their own observations and who fulfill their oaths instead of arbitrary Pharmafia or government rules: if patients are dying on the battlefield, and the dying stops significantly and consistently after treatment with product A, then we know enough to start acting.

Many thanks, dear Dr. Pierre Kory and your many allies, who risked jobs, health and careers, and saved countless lives, not only by treating the sick, but also by warning the healthy against the mRNA jabs!