No-virus: a contagious disease that may kill you!

by Mees Baaijen, March 21, 2025, 1100 words, 4 minutes

virus in a flower

No-virus: a contagious disease that may kill you!

Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief. - Frantz Fanon

I’m still baffled seeing intelligent persons fall for the no-virus deception. In my first post on this subject I pointed at a logical fallacy of no-virus:

that highly variable terrain patterns cannot lead to the fairly uniformed and synchronized disease patterns we see in many infectious diseases.

As was to be expected, this claim wasn’t addressed by any no-virus proponent.

Probably nobody has unmasked and refuted the lies, misrepresentations and deceptions of the no-virus leaders (Cowan, Kaufman, the Baileys and others) as respectfully, patiently and meticulously as Jeremy Hammond, in a series of articles. If you are still in doubt, I highly recommend you these papers.

Therefore, this short piece is not a rebuttal, but a warning: the belief that viruses do not exist may cause you and other people great harm, or even kill you!

The first example is the use of ivermectin as an anti-viral medicine. Two months ago, the cute dr. Sam Bailey published a video on this subject, which Tom Cowan immediately recommended highly to his followers. Now if you hold the belief, or as they say, the hard scientific proof that viruses do not exist, why would you want to discuss an anti-viral medicine? That’s weird.

But it gets weirder: the proof that ivermectin does not kill viruses is solely based on a critique by Dr. Baily of one 2020 in vitro study. That’s a preliminary study in a lab to see if viruses (grown on a cell culture) can be killed by an anti-viral. If a drug kills a virus in a lab, then it may also do it in a patient.

Studies on patients are called clinical studies (in vivo), and already in July 2021 dr. Tess Lawrie published a clinical study (see this very interesting video with time stamps) on the effect of ivermectin in Covid patients.

What’s more, it was a meta study, where the effects of multiple studies are summarized. The results were very clear: treatment, as early as possible, with ivermectin is very effective in preventing death by Covid. On top, ivermectin also has a preventive or protective effect, and was used as such by many frontline doctors and nurses, with great success.

In a sane world, these two properties of the drug should have stopped the jab campaigns immediately – but we happen to live in an insane world, see Dr. Pierre Kory’s book, The War on Ivermectin.

Naturally, the no-virus leaders cannot expose or explain these clinical ivermectin studies to their followers. So, they must deceive them by withholding this important and lifesaving information, while distracting them with obsolete analyses, as the smiling dr. Sam did with the lab study.

They also spread the lie that ivermectin is very important for Big Pharma’s profits: yet its patent expired almost 30 years ago. Billions of doses of cheap ivermectin were donated to African countries with parasite problems in humans. When the plandemic started, generic ivermectin for human use was widely available, often over the counter, and very cheap.

The truth was that Big Pharma quickly used its enormous power to blackwash ivermectin, by spreading the “horse dewormer” hoax, and even by falsifying studies: because this wonderful, well documented, save, cheap and successful drug should have stopped the jabs, which were the real profit generators – and the real destroyers of human health.

On a second danger, the development of bioweapons (in the second third of the 20th century), I already recommended The Sleeper Agent by Adam Finnegan, which also discusses that some devastating, lab generated microbial diseases (like Lyme disease) are very difficult and costly to diagnose and treat, as they give the impression that no germs are involved: yet these diseases paralyze the immune system (also called immune tolerance) and may cause serious chronic (fatigue and other) syndromes.

The Covid virus carries atypical elements that only could have been added in a bioweapon lab. Even so, it had to be “helped” to cause sufficient mortality (see my first paper) and enough panic to justify the use of experimental mRNA jabs, which turned out much more disastrous than the virus. This was possibly by design.

From studies of the outbreaks on the Diamond Princess and during the Gangelt carnival (prof. Streeck) it was known that 80-90% of the population had (cross-)immunity against the “not so novel” Covid/corona virus, so only 10-20% could be infected or harmed by the virus (this cross immunity is caused by previous contact with dozens of different coronaviruses, naturally occurring in our environment and microbiome).

Therefore, the genetic Covid jabs, given to say 80 % of the population and often repeated, had a much bigger and longer lasting potential for harm than the virus.

Fortunately, the no-virus adepts are against vaccination. But their spreading of false or obsolete stories about ivermectine, and their hiding of its great value for Covid patients was dangerous and probably caused harm. As Jeremy Hammond states:

SARS‑CoV‑2 exists. The pervasive virus denialism that has regrettably penetrated the health freedom movement is harmfully counter-productive. To combat the threat of medical tyranny accompanying the COVID‑19 pandemic by denying the virus’s existence is to legitimize accusations leveled by the advocates of authoritarianism that misinformation is emanating from within the health freedom movement.

It is also irresponsible to mislead people into believing that a potentially deadly virus does not exist since anyone espousing that belief will naturally feel it unnecessary to take any steps to protect themselves or their loved ones. The message to the public harmfully becomes, for example, that there is no need to get more sunshine or supplement vitamin D to support your immune system against SARS‑CoV‑2 since the virus doesn’t exist!

We must do the hard labor of fighting the medical tyranny with effective arguments rather than lazily contenting ourselves with self-delusion. There’s much work yet to be done to protect ourselves and future generations of humanity from medical tyranny. I beg my readers, please, let’s get to it.

Indeed, and that’s why this is my last post on no-virus, a deceptive distraction that absorbed too much of my time! Goodbye, no-virus!